Critical essay on James Davenport and Charles Chauncey free essay sample

Out With the Old, In With the New There were multiple factors that influenced the Great Awakening in the early seventeen hundreds. From 1730 to 1740, rebellion spread throughout the colonies causing a major religious warfare between churches. In Contending Voice, Hollitz shows us the perspective of two famous preachers that gave the Great Awakening a stir of madness. The â€Å"wild,† â€Å"indecent,† and work of â€Å"mad men† revolutionized the way colonist viewed how religion could be so intense frequently causing â€Å"Mayhem in the church† (Hollitz 34) (qtd Hollitz 42). The two leaders were utterly different with their take upon how the colonist should react toward their faith in God. Seen as the outspoken minister in the Great Awakening, James Davenport was in my opinion a hellraiser. Some may disagree about my decision, but there were distinct actions made by Davenport that couldn’t be passed up to not classify as clear â€Å"hellraiser† intentions. James had a mind set of reaching out of the â€Å"uninspired preaching† that should be portrayed through enthusiasm and emotion to express your inner touch with God (Hollitz 37). We will write a custom essay sample on Critical essay on James Davenport and Charles Chauncey or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page From being deported out of the colony and defined as â€Å"non compos mentis† James Davenport faced various challenges trying to promote his new style of praising the lord (Hollitz 42). He stopped at nothing to get colonists to convert to the way he preached and reacted to religion. As for Charles Chauncey, the â€Å"Old Brick† of the decade, was the complete opposite of his rival James Davenport (qtd Hollitz 37). Being as simplistic and conventional as Chauncy could, I labeled him as a trailblazer. As Hollitz points out, Chauncy was an uninspired preacher but was vaguely labeled as â€Å"Great Awakening’s most ferocious critic† (Hollitz 37). Chauncey’s perspective of religion was to never stray from the traditional zeal of god that has been around since the beginning. To Chauncey, Davenport’s actions caused a horrific flow of religion throughout the colonies. In Charles’ Enthusiasm Described and Caution’d Against (1742), he states â€Å"The cause of this enthusiasm is bad temperament of the blood and spirits; ‘tis properly a disease, a sort of madness† showing that he absolutely despised what his contender was doing to everyone and everything (Hollitz 46). It’s not that Chauncey wanted everything his way of preaching, he just wanted the  colonists to know the unconditional truth about God, not the nonsense James portrayed for everyone to follow. From New Lights like James and Old Lights like Chauncy, it’s safe to say that Davenport had a greater impact on the Great Awakening than Charles (Hollitz 44). The argument of how the colonists should behave toward religion was well reconstructed by Davenport’s preparation to relieve the dilemma of their religion running low (Hollitz 35). The theme of authority and subsequent enthusiasm has taken over the colonies altering the minds thanks to the legendary hellraiser that is James Davenport.